Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiber optic adapter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Terrible topic on what appears to be a notable subject Drmies (talk) 23:54, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Fiber optic adapter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Has no claim to notability. Contested PROD. Created by a puppetmaster, probably while blocked. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   03:47, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 00:14, 29 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak keep Google search indicates that it's a product from multiple vendors. Article is probably not a good starting point for the topic so I won't be sad if we have to start over. Puppetmaster/blocked accusations don't help here. -—Kvng 03:27, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 13:48, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ΛΧΣ  21™  19:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.