Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiction based religion

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 08:12, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

Fiction based religion
Inherently POV, more "church of reality" promo. --W(t) 05:24, 2005 Jun 7 (UTC)
 * Delete per Weyes. ESkog 05:44, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Blatant POV --Xcali 06:07, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment No reference to Church of Reality in this article.--Marcperkel 06:39, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Without passing judgment, I note that this is the author of both the article in question and Church of Reality. ESkog 04:57, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism, original research. --Angr/undefined 06:34, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep, Reference in cult info article on Scientology --Marcperkel 06:39, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Toytoy 07:24, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Inherently POV to suggest that all religions based on faith are in fact based on fiction. -- BD2412 talk 19:36, 2005 Jun 7 (UTC)
 * Delete - POV if I ever did see. Celestianpower 19:42, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense. Karol 20:04, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * delete; aren't all religions based on fiction? Dunc|&#9786; 20:36, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * All but one. The problem is, nobody knows which one. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:15, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. The world needs more places where people can argue 'my god is less fictitious than your god'. Delete. Niteowlneils 21:56, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete inherently POV to claim religion X is more fictional than religion Y. Unless religion X is that of the Invisible pink unicorn etc.     22:35, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Fiction-based article. The Church of Reality, whose web site propounds this concept, is a religion with 1 adherent.  The only even tangential mentions of this concept outside of the general proselytizing by that 1 adherent are, as is the link given above, in fact matching the phrase "science-fiction based religion", and are where people are talking specifically about Scientology, not about some general classification scheme for religions.  original research.  Delete. Uncle G 23:09, 2005 Jun 7 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense, patently POV stuff. --Etacar11 01:37, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Rama 13:25, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Personal essay, original research, neologism, no evidence presented that this is a genuine term in reasonably widespread use. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:13, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Stupid and may invite vandalism and idiocy. For a precedent: Votes for deletion/Matrixism, which dealt with a religion based on The Matrix, led to a merge. The merge was rejected as unverifiable, and a wave of vandalism followed(see "Matrixism linkspamming vandal" under Wikipedia:Most_vandalized_pages#Specific_anonymous_vandals). Matrixism had to be protected from recreation as well. &mdash; Phil Welch 00:33, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .