Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiddien

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep --BM 00:36, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Fiddien
Wikipedia is not a genealogy database. Radiant! 15:31, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)

The discussion Deletion_policy/Maltese_nobility has been started to deal with this article and the half a dozen related ones. Please do not vote below, but go to that discussion so that a consensus can be reached on the group, rather than having to repeat arguments on each individual article.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete -- Genealogy research article Longhair 18:40, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; article about nobility family line; notable. &mdash; RJH 20:18, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * More of the original research Maltese nobility stuff created by User:Tancarville. We need a standard policy on all of his articles.  RickK 21:29, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Concur with Rick. Tancarville has made dozens of similar pages, although they seem copy/pasted from his webpage. Should we create a subpage at VfD to discuss his work, and whether it belongs here, or in wikisource, or neither? Radiant! 09:05, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Important historical data. --Centauri 12:36, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)