Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel: Hollywood's Favorite Tyrant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Those sources should really be added to the article, though... Shimeru (talk) 00:51, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Fidel: Hollywood's Favorite Tyrant
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

An essentially unsourced article about a book whose significance is not explained. Guy (Help!) 09:35, 6 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak keep, or merge to the author. I'm not finding a lot about the book outside the conservative web-world, but the author was interviewed on C-Span about the book. The state of the article is significantly queered by one editor's apparent campaign against the author. Mangoe (talk) 10:47, 6 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep C-Span interview per above and and critical review  review in denver post I didnt read  etc. Meets WP:NBOOK --Savonneux (talk) 21:25, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as its own article. I would encourage editors to expand the article. Digby (talk) 15:07, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - borderline case; I've put a "rescue" tag on it, since I may be wrong (hey, it could happen). It's from a notoriously non-reliable publisher. There is no sourcing of substance, and the references are to the usual right-wing suspects. There is little or no evidence that this has been taken seriously anywhere in the real world outside the sealed gardens of the right. (Full disclosure: I lived in Miami for quite a while, and wearied of the violent obsessiveness of many of the local anti-Castro fanatics.) -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:41, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Click the Google news search link at the top of the AFD.  The first two summaries alone should prove its notable.   D r e a m Focus  19:30, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.