Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidelitatem et Constantiam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Lublin.  Sandstein  16:10, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Fidelitatem et Constantiam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability - it's a phrase that someone used once, that's it. I'd speedy it but it doesn't fit into any of the categories and I doubt nominator is or knows someone who lived over 300 years ago. Smartyllama (talk) 20:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep and Expand A search finds a smattering of additional sources; this isn't E Plurbus Unum but it seems to merit an entry. DarjeelingTea (talk) 22:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

The document is an official Bill, signed by the King. There is a possibility to add more sources to this. The motto is used along with Coat of Arms, as the symbol of Lublin. Current reference has been made to official site, where legal decisions and acts of law are stored. Dear Smartyllama, can you assist me in working out, how to make this article more Wikipedial, please? Thanks!
 * Keep: This Article shall remain: The phrase has been used both by the King (a former authority), and current City Authorites. It is the starting sequence of the document.

Poland B (talk) 20:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails GNG. There are no policy-based reasons to keep this stub but the partisans will sure argue the point. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 12:20, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Lublin: surely we do not need a full article on a city motto, or perhaps the target would be History of Lublin, if we had it. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Lublin. While some mottos can be notable (For Your Freedom and Ours, etc.) this one does not appear to be discussed by any sources except briefly in the context of this city, and said sources are not very significant (I couldn't find a single book mention). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:47, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Lublin, which presently has no mention of this. North America1000 09:02, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Lublin; the subject does not appear to be independently notable. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:49, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to lublin. Pwolit iets (talk) 01:06, 23 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.