Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Field Engineer Marketplace


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:35, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Field Engineer Marketplace

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a non-notable business. The references lack WP:CORPDEPTH: they are blog posts, PR puff pieces in niche publications, routine coverage, etc. Article creator is a WP:SPA who created two related highly promotional articles (one of which has already been deleted, Malik zakaria) and likely has a conflict of interest. Deli nk (talk) 16:39, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  19:17, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  19:17, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  19:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  19:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - large numbers of single-purpose accounts have been adding inappropriate links to this article. Clearly a promotional effort. . . Mean as custard (talk) 11:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Sources are advertorials in trade magazines, blogs/interviews and routine announcements. A Google search did not reveal any possible better sources. Aside from the obvious promotional COI-editing and spamming, it is simply WP:TOOSOON for this topic. GermanJoe (talk) 11:49, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * comment I have toned down the worst of the promo. MAC, I don't understand your above comment; only the author and the three IPs could be considered SPAs, everyone else in it's short history has been half sysop and half cleanup crew. I'd decline an A7, and as I have nuked the promo, I don't think a G11 would be accepted as well. L3X1 (distænt write)  16:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't want to put words in his mouth, but MAC seems to be saying that editors that haven't edited this article have been repeatedly adding wikilinks to this article. See for example  and .  Deli nk (talk) 16:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * For the record, the creator of this article has now been blocked, along with a number of socks, for abusing multiple accounts: Sockpuppet investigations/Mir.Mustafa.Ali.  Deli nk (talk) 21:16, 8 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete TOOSOON. I see some press releases, but not a lot of indepth. L3X1 (distænt write)  16:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.