Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Field Guide: Southern Vehicles 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing keep for now. If merge is of interest, please discuss on article talk page and relevant projects. Thanks everyone for contributing and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 15:50, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Field Guide: Southern Vehicles 2

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominated both Field Guide: Southern Vehicles 2 and Field Guide: Northern Vehicles 2, near-identical articles with identical problems: a total lack of notability. One very short review in a niche publication, and that's about it. Searching for more sources produces a handful of fan and forum pages, and nothing else. Both games supplements lack the required notability to have an article (separate or combined). Fram (talk) 09:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Neither "keep" comment makes much sense in light of notability guidelines etc.
 * Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge the reviews into Heavy Gear. BOZ (talk) 13:46, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * As an admin, I would hope that you would know that "keep if more sources exist" is quite a useless vote? If the deletion nomination is because of lack of notability, then stating "keep if notable" is not really helpful at all. Yes, as the article creator you probably want it kept, that's a given, but keeping every piece of trivia and adding any minireview in specialized magazines to main articles violates WP:UNDUE and doesn't actually improve Wikipedia. Fram (talk) 08:48, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge per BOZ. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 06:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Why keep? What makes you think that these are notable? Fram (talk) 07:31, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Heavy Gear. A single source just isn't enough to establish notability. Not a very active user (talk) 06:40, 18 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.