Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fifty-One Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete, allow recreation. It would not be out of the realm of possibilities to delete this under G11. - crz crztalk 17:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Fifty-One Entertainment


Non-notable organization. Google searches for "Djuan Edgerton", "Tracy Childress", "51 Entertainment", and "Fifty-One Entertainment" bring up nothing relevant. Sounds like the article is selling the company and flaunting its accomplishments more than anything. Nameneko 04:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 05:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to be supported by Young Buck according to external link. Needs some treatment to get rid of POV, but pretty much salvagable. Should perhaps be renamed to focus on the mentioned event instead. - Mgm|(talk) 10:14, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, no good reason for deletion listed. This is verifable. Trollderella 17:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete a felicitous combination of WP:SPAM, WP:VAIN, which manages to fail WP:CORP, WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC. Eusebeus 00:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Article is nothing more than a copy-and-pasted press release right now but there are hints of notability. Rewrite, move, or merge as per MGM's suggestion. Sockatume 05:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks NN to me. WMMartin 16:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above points. Sharkface217 03:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, allow recreation - the current text is utter spam, but there has been notability expressed. Rather than having a slightly-modified press release, let someone right a NPOV article from scratch. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 19:49, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.