Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fight or Flight (game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete  Marasmusine (talk) 11:04, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Fight or Flight (game)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability. Appears to just be another iPhone game. But I'm not certain of its worth and I'd like to see other contributors' opinions. Greg Tyler (t &bull; c) 13:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no assertion of notability. Just another random article that fails WP:VGSCOPE--Unionhawk Talk 13:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  14:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no assertion of importance or significance. Drawn Some (talk) 14:47, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 17:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No assertion of notability. Could possibility qualify for speedy deletion per WP:SD, as well, but I'm not sure whether such a thing is "web content" or not. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 17:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – plenty of download listings, but nothing providing significant coverage to establish notability. And no, I do not consider this A7 territory as, this being a downloadable app, it can stand alone on a console; hence, not necessarily web content. MuZemike 17:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Why is web content eligible for speedy deletion under those circumstances, anyway? Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 17:59, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Simple. It's the same reason why unremarkable people or organizations are A7'd. Just like users write articles saying "John Doe is awesome", "Acme corporation is awesome", or "My garage band is awesome"; we get those who write articles on websites saying "This website is awesome"; go to the top of Special:NewPages for excellent examples. If there's nothing stating why they're remarkable in any way, then A7 applies. MuZemike 01:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks. I always assumed it was something to do with copyright, similar to WP:BLP. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 02:08, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. Marasmusine (talk) 11:04, 9 May 2009 (UTC)