Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fightback (Canada) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Withdrawn nomination with no outstanding delete !votes. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 22:07, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Fightback (Canada)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Insignificant organization. None of the sources are notable. Seems to be a vanity/promotional article. Article was previously deleted by AFD and then recreated. Senatrix (talk) 06:35, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Change to Keep - While the organization is still insignificant the sourcing problem has been fixed. It appears that a member of Fightback created the article and is highly involved in editing it so it needs to be monitored for COI. Senatrix (talk) 13:51, 12 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 08:35, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 08:35, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - This organization is significant enough to be covered in multiple news sources (which don't need to themselves be notable). The previous AfD was in 2005 before all of these sources were written. -- Explodicle (T/C) 20:09, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


 *  Delete  - Let's put it this way: I've been heavily involved with the Federal and Provincial (Ontario) NDP basically my whole life and I've never heard of this publication as sad as I am to encourage removal of a Marxism related article from wikipedia the publication is most likely not notable. Simonm223 (talk) 21:24, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Notability on Wikipedia is determined by available sources, not an editor's personal familiarity with the topic. -- Explodicle (T/C) 14:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Most recent edit to page brings it over notability line, good work. Simonm223 (talk) 18:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.