Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filament Games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 20:58, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Filament Games

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Educational game developer that fails WP:CORPDEPTH, with no evidence of significant coverage anywhere. It's entirely possible one of their games could be notable, but that is not inherited by the company. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies,  and Education.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete None of their games are notable, and there's lack of coverage of their company. --M asem (t) 15:08, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment found some sources., , , Timur9008 (talk) 18:07, April 29, 2023 (UTC)
 * Those are quite good. However, to quote WP:GNG, "multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability." Therefore I am not 100% sold on withdrawing the AfD unless something else significant pops up, as three of those are from the same newspaper, so essentially there are only a couple so far. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:21, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 18:17, 7 May 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:03, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I got this hit in the NY Times, but I think it talks more about the founder and it's paywalled so I can't see what it says. Oaktree b (talk) 02:07, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It's almost entirely about their games, not the studio itself. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:06, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If it goes into the studio's products, that could be helpful. M asem (t) 02:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak keep - scratches the surface of notability per given sources and my own searches. Merko (talk) 01:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.