Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FilesAnywhere


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

FilesAnywhere

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Extensive unsourced claims of notability (first, popular), tagged for a long time without resolution of concerns about tone and lack of citations. DMacks (talk) 23:09, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 31 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: Per this PC Magazine review, this book coverage, this journal coverage, and this book coverage. SL93 (talk) 01:47, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep and close – The nomination doesn't include a valid rationale for deletion, per WP:DEL-REASON. WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM is the solution for this article. Sources are available; I've added those listed by User:SL93 above to the article. Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.