Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filewax


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete a7, no valid assertion of notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:46, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Filewax

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I didn't go with WP:CSD since there is a claim of importance, but this definitely fails WP:WEB. PROD removed by IP (since IP also removed COI tag at same time, good chance it was the author while logged off). Singularity42 (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I'd have been happy with an A7 myself, though I have stopped posting CSD's for a number of reasons. In any case, there's really not enough there to establish notability or a reason to include it in the Wiki.  Cheers.  Bagheera (talk) 17:53, 20 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment. As nominator, I am now supporting an A7 speedy delete. The only claim of importance was the sentence "Filewax is one of the world's largest file-hosting sites." (which was probably copied from the article the author based the new article on). The new content now says the website came online in October 2009. Therefore, the claim of importance/significance is no longer credible, and A7 applies. I will tag the article accordingly. Singularity42 (talk) 18:42, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.