Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted per WP:A7. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 22:28, 20 November 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

Filim

 * – ( View AfD View log )

New streaming platform or application. No indication of significance. Pikavoom (talk) 10:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Please explain the reason to nominate my article for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pallis and Pakodas (talk • contribs) 11:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:03, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:03, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:04, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * please read WP:GNG and WP:NCORP and explain how this company meets the criteria Spiderone  11:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

What nonsese! Why are you so biased? Please tell me the actual process and what content should be uploaded to get the page approved. Please don't nominate for deletion with silly and unconfirmed reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pallis and Pakodas (talk • contribs) 16:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Strong delete Not only does the app not appear to be notable, the article does not explain why the article should be classified as even significant, and the article's content is extremely biased in favor of this app. I do feel this article is actually eligible for A7 and G11 speedy deletion, instead of AfD. P.S. It turns out that the article was a copyright violation and it was blanked in its entirety with the exception of the word "Filim" therefore, G12 applies because there is no substantial content. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 12:28, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Feel there's no need to delete this app. It seems genuine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FILIMApp (talk • contribs) 11:39, 20 November 2020 (UTC) — FILIMApp (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Firstly, deleting the Wikipedia page for the app won't get rid of the app from existence. Also, your username looks slightly suspicious... JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 12:28, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - it's mentioned by several sources but I can only find press release/promo articles in largely blog-like sources    . Note that the content of each article is almost identical.  Spiderone  12:39, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete could also be deleted as G7 as the page has been blanked.Faizal batliwala (talk) 13:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * G12 speedy As the article was a pure copyvio. Jumpytoo Talk 19:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment It has been A7'd. It can be closed. 20:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.