Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filip Zekavičić


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:57, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Filip Zekavičić

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 23:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 00:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 00:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 00:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete non-notable basketball player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:NHOOPS includes a provision of "or a similar major professional sports league." He played six games in the Polish Basketball League.  So I think the question is if the PBL is high enough to qualify as a major professional league.  The wikipedia page says its professional and their champions have historically, including the year he played, automatically qualified for the regular season of the Euroleague.  To me, that is enough to say he meets the presumption. RonSigPi (talk) 23:21, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment The PBL doesn't specifically meet the guideline and I don't think it is accurate to say that every player who has ever played even one game in the league should be presumed notable, as is generally true of the leagues specifically named. If he played in Euroleague games that would be a different matter. Best bet would be to prove that this subject meets WP:GNG, as this supersedes any sport guideline anyway. If it can't be proven he meets GNG then the article should be deleted. Rikster2 (talk) 13:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:NHOOPS and a google search didn't yield anything more than databases and youtube videos. RonSigPi (talk) 20:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.