Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filiph Sandström


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:06, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Filiph Sandström

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Autobiography, mostly primary sources with no indication of notability per WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Sole claim to notability is being "one of the first software developers to develop a fully featured application for the Nintendo 3DS homebrew scene". No significant coverage from WP:Reliable sources. Speedy declined in 2015, so taking it to AFD. Mr. MacTidy (talk) 10:16, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mr. MacTidy (talk) 10:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Mr. MacTidy (talk) 10:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Mr. MacTidy (talk) 10:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Mr. MacTidy (talk) 10:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete a run-of-the-mill software developer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nom's concerns and my own evaluation for sources. --Izno (talk) 13:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence whatsoever for notability. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 14:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No real claim to notability. I can't find any sources in Swedish or English to show that he is notable. --bonadea contributions talk 09:50, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails the WP:GNG, someone who unofficially develops games for a console (ie not professional or employed) isn't exactly a likely path to Wikipedia's definition of notability anyways. Sergecross73   msg me  14:53, 5 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.