Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fillet (webzine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash talk 01:58, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Fillet (webzine)
Delete; completely not notable and not significant enough for WP. #1 hit on google for this is a post asking how to drive more traffic to the site. I don't think the webzine is even in "business" anymore and even when it was, it was insignificant. No need to have a memorial for a failed idea here. Dbchip 01:10, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete mostly redlined links, absolutely not notable.--MONGO 02:39, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I do not think it was even notable in 1996-1997.Das Nerd 06:56, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I found this page in which the zine creator asks how to get higher traffic.
 * Delete. Webzines come and go, one that only ran for 2 years and has no lasting effects will be unverifiable and unencyclopedic. Couldn't find hits on writer's market search engines. - Mgm|(talk) 10:42, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. --StuffOfInterest 13:34, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.