Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filmörnen (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Not really enough of a consensus for deletion at this time. Merge discussions may take place through editorial consensus, at the article's talk page. Cirt (talk) 18:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Filmörnen
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable Swedish film festival. Last AfD ended in no consensus with the only two users who commented giving invalid arguments (i.e. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and claiming sources exist without quoting them or inserting them in article). Six months later, this still has not established notability and probably never will. There are also serious conflict of interest issues with this article. Redfarmer (talk) 20:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or merge to Värmlands Filmförbund. For a festival that's supposedly existed since 1978, I admit I find it shocking that there's so little information about this, though I did find this and this in what appear to be reliable sources.  I must say I disagree with the nominator's comment in the previous discussion that "[i]f notability isn't 'huge,' it shouldn't have an article."  That's not policy.  However, to the extent this festival can be considered a "product" of Värmlands Filmförbund, WP:PRODUCT implies that it "should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy."  That article's currently a stub with virtually no content, so a merge seems like the best course of action.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 21:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * It should be noted that the company's article is marginal notability as well and was included in the last nomination. I broke it up this time to allow individual consideration. AfD for the company is here.Redfarmer (talk) 21:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * It's actually not a company, it's a not-for-profit regional film (lover's) association. Possibly this is not easy to figure out if you don't read Swedish. Tomas e (talk) 19:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: This discussion is not linked properly from the article - it has a redlink in the template where the link to this article should be! Tomas e (talk) 12:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The link is correctly formed, as you could easily check by clicking on it—you would be brought here. Sometimes links to new pages will appear as a redlink for a while; I once read why this was, and although I forget the specifics I think it's related to Purge.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 13:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, now I noticed this was the case. I've never noticed this phenomenon before. Sorry for wasting space in the discussion. Tomas e (talk) 19:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 05:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, a regional film festival, but one with a long history, so I think it makes the cut. Could be merged to Värmlands Filmförbund to provide a more substantial article, since the festival seems to be that association's main claim to fame. Tomas e (talk) 19:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.