Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Film-type Patterned Retarder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Film-type Patterned Retarder

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Current sources are clearly press releases from one company (LC) and quick (but not comprehensive) Google search suggests this may be a one-company technology which has not yet created any real buzz.  T RANSPORTER M AN  ( TALK ) 13:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

This technology has been around for quite a while. LG's "film-type" appears to be an improvement on polarizing filters for 3D displays. Maybe a paragraph devoted to FPR here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3-D_film#Polarization_systems would be more informative.98.112.184.205 (talk) 21:09, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The design is notable (Google and Scholar ) and is more than a stub, I do not see why a "buzz" is required, simply notablility and sources. Possibly Merge to 3DTV or 3DTV though. Chaosdruid (talk) 20:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:22, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.