Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Film Victoria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Withdrew due to changed content. Keep (non-admin closure)  Btilm 21:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Film Victoria

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Belongs in wiktionary.  Btilm 23:40, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Wiktionary is for dictionary definitions, this is about a government agency in Australia.  Jujutacular  T · C 00:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment The article would seem to be in need of expansion. it's too short a stub for me to judge at this point.   DGG ( talk ) 00:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Stub has now been expanded with many references to assert notability.  Lugnuts  (talk) 17:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly a WP article now. Sources are adequate, and article is not promotional  Good work by Shirt58.    DGG ( talk ) 18:47, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Lugnuts.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:52, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Film Victoria is a major part of Australian film history and this will probably one day be a great article. New material added to article provides evidence for that view and support for it to pass WP:N. - DustFormsWords (talk) 22:57, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Yes, the article doesn't quite do it justice yet, but Film Australia is that country's public film producer, somewhat akin to the National Film Board of Canada and is clearly notable. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:15, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I agree with everyone now. When I marked it for deletion, it had little information on it.  Btilm  13:10, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.