Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filmhouse Cinemas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:56, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Filmhouse Cinemas

 * – ( View AfD View log )

"Hello, Please could someone list the article Filmhouse Cinemas for discussion with the following rationale.

"The article for the distribution side of this company was deleted approximately a year and a half ago, deletion discussion is here. About a month after being deleted an article on the distribution companies cinema chain was created by a user who has since been indefinitely blocked for spamming and advertising. The only users to add content to the article are the blocked account and a single purpose Corporate IP address from Nigeria.

The majority of the sources in the article are either trivial coverage or run of the mill corporate coverage, e.g. mentions of them opening new locations, a mention of them installing Imax equipment and their CEO resigning. The other sources in the article consist of some defunct paid for press releases sites, 2 mentions in a blog and a google drive link that I really didn't feel like clicking. Searching online turns up a lot of press releases, paid for coverage and SEO spam, but I could find no reliable independent coverage of this cinema chain. I can see no evidence that this chain of cinemas is any more notable than when it's distribution company article was deleted. There may of course be sources in other languages or something that I've missed, hence listing it here."

Thank you 192.76.8.72 (talk) 02:07, 11 November 2020 (UTC) edited at 192.76.8.72 (talk) 03:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)"

The article listed on behalf of IP. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 03:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 03:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 03:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 03:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 03:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. <i style="font-family:'Rock salt','Comic Sans MS'; color: Green;">Tyw7</i> (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 03:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. <i style="font-family:'Rock salt','Comic Sans MS'; color: Green;">Tyw7</i> (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 03:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per Nom. Fails WP:NCORP. This is just a company listing that was recreated on flimsy, transient merits using press releases that provide trivial and promotional coverage. I can't see any significance for the individual movie houses to even be listed in city articles as an alternative to deletion.  Otr500 (talk) 08:22, 11 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.