Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filter Pilter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mkativerata (talk) 22:25, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Filter Pilter

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Hoax, as far as I can tell. Nothing on Google or Google Scholar. Chris (talk) 18:12, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Unable to locate anything on it. Eudemis (talk) 21:58, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as worthless. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete my searches came up empty. &mdash; Scientizzle 14:44, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It is a non-notable neologism. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  12:21, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.