Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filter list rejection page


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:33, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Filter list rejection page
Almost no content. Likely a dicdef at best, and I'm sure we have this covered somewhere else. Non-notable anyway. Deltabeignet 03:18, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. —Cleared as filed. 09:16, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fairly useless, as that's not actually the name of the page in most systems, and the article is a dictdef. Is it important to define this term, when the term isn't consistently used?  I think not, so no need to mention transwiki -- just let it go its way peacefully. Geogre 09:49, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete pointless and unencyclopaedic. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 14:18, 9 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.