Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final-nelson

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. BLANKFAZE | (&#1095;&#1090;&#1086;??) 21:24, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Final-nelson
Is this supposed combative move somehow encyclopedic? Why or why not? --GRider\talk 22:57, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * You tell me: clearly write what action you think should be taken for the nominated article to assist others in determining consensus. —Markaci 2005-03-14 T 22:58 Z
 * Delete, probably joke. Jackie Chan wasn't dead, last I heard. Kappa 02:13, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, "the late Jackie Chan" - likely hoax. Megan1967 06:09, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn hoaxcruft. ComCat 08:54, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as hoax. I'm pretty sure Chan isn't dead. Mgm|(talk) 08:54, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.