Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Destination 5: The Death Trip


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Final Destination 5: The Death Trip

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Well, I was going to redirect this but I started researching and there is no such thing as "Final Destination 5: The Death Trip". No independent sources (or an IMDb entry). Filming obviously hasn't begun. Apparently "Death Trip" was the title for The Final Destination in its early stages (source) — Mike   Allen   06:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  ——  Mike   Allen   06:28, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, possibly speedy, as a hoax at best, or confusion at worst. Unverifiable that a fifth film is even being made, much less is in production, failing WP:V and WP:NFF. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 06:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Some discussion of a fifth film, but nothing certain at this stage, and nothing to warrant an article. Possibility of Final Destination 5 discussed already at the Final Destination series article. I would suggest that it's not a hoax, but an overeager fan. Moswento (talk) 07:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - No references, no press releases, and, to my knowledge, the fourth movie was the end of the series. Possible hoax. ~  Baron Von Yiffington  . talk . contribs 12:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Although it's actually listed on IMDB, it seems to fail WP:NFF anyway. — Rankiri (talk) 15:10, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete as a hoax. The article creator,  is likely a sockpuppet of, blocked for being a vandalism-only account.  Masolipis's edit here is much like Locked333's edit here. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 18:52, 20 April 2010 (UTC)




 * Delete or incubate  without prejudice as NOT A HOAX, but simply too early for a seperate article. I agree with the nominator's initial thought toward setting a Redirect to Final Destination (film series), where speculation of a 5th in the series might best be covered.  Not exactly RS in the strictest sense, but Slashfilm, Screenrant, Shock Till You Drop, and others all make note of Warner Bros. head Alan Horn announcing at ShoWest that they're planning Final Destination 5.  So while the article is speculative, the chase for consumer dollars makes the project likely.  Wikipedia can afford to be patient and revisit this topic when it receives more coverage and in reliable sources.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:58, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I should have been clearer about my mention of it as a hoax. I was recalling Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alvin and the Chipmunks 3: The Chipmunk Rampage (film) where there was verifiable development talk about a third film, but the article itself was a hoax using these rumors.  In any case, I have no issue with the development information at the film series article, and Final Destination 5 now redirects there.  (The redirect was just created by an admin since it was salted.) Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 20:57, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Makes sense to me. Delete the current crap article as the redirect takes readers to where sourced information about a speculated 5th in the series has context. Nice.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q.`


 * Delete. While I agree that the article is not a hoax, I also feel it is premature—and there are not enough reliable sources—for an article yet. Additionally, there are no sources for the title of the film. Based on that, I see no need to leave a redirect behind. —C.Fred (talk) 20:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.