Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finally Famous: Born a Thug Die a Thug (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Finally Famous: Born a Thug Die a Thug
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Deleted twice, still fails wp:music which states that "Articles and information about albums with confirmed release dates in the near future must be confirmed by reliable sources". The 1 ref is not a RS. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-08-02t12:30z 12:30, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  — Cliff smith  talk  16:55, 2 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree with the consensus in the previous nomination. Still fails to establish reliable sources. See WP:NALBUMS. Noir (talk) 12:56, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( X! ·  talk )  · @172  · 03:08, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is proof that this album is real and the album comes out in 23 days. I think that is close enough. There are articles for albums that come out in 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.88.161.142 (talk) 18:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. See WP:BEFORE - a Google search would have found the reliable sources that the article is lacking. The artist is unquestionably notable, the tracklisting has been confirmed in a press release, reproduced at various sites, including this one, the release date is confirmed by MTV, there's coverage in The Source here, from allhiphop.com here, and from examiner.com here. I believe that's sufficient for the article to be kept - I would expect further coverage and several reviews closer to the release date. These sources weren't around at the time of the first AFD.--Michig (talk) 18:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep and expand with the sources listed by Michig -- Cabe  6403  (Talk•Sign) 14:44, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Michig. Esradekan (talk) 02:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.