Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability not established for 5 years.  Puffin  Let's talk! 10:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

This does seem notable Brazil's a pretty big country. At worst, merge into Brazilian Ministry of Science of Technology, but otherwise keep. Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:00, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. National government institutions of major countries are generally considered to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ministry of Science and Technology (Brazil). The article is basically a dictionary definition without sources (there's nothing to merge). Algébrico (talk) 16:49, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The article has no resemblence whatsoever to a dictionary definition. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:06, 10 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep I've added a link to the Ministry of Science and Technology and a translation of the the organization name on the page. It's a stub that needs to be expanded and updated.  A translation of the Portuguese page would be a good starting point. Listmeister (talk) 14:42, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.