Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Financial Accessibility of National Parks in the United States


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 07:10, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Financial Accessibility of National Parks in the United States

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Combination of POV pushing and an index of park fees (WP:NOTTRAVEL), neither of which belong on Wikipedia. (another student essay by the same group) – Train2104 (t • c) 01:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete or Userfy per nom. Topic itself may be suitable for inclusion, but the article's current form is not the way to do it. After reviewing the talk page, it would appear neither of the instructors raised concern over neutrality, but rather encouraged such POV; which is both disconcerting and deeply unfortunate. One may wish to keep an eye on other sandboxed/draft articles emanating from this Wiki Edu project as several waiting in the hopper are equally biased as this one up for discussion. -- dsprc   [talk]  23:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Extremely selective merge to National Park Service. There are a couple of good references, and they could go to make up a paragraph in the main article. Otherwise delete as POV-pushing. StAnselm (talk) 20:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * TNT This entire topic is WP:OR from nps.gov - the title "Financial Accessibility" is OR, article is full of unsourced POV like "Accessibility to national parks can decrease during this administration because President Trump has threatened to defund the National Parks Service. This would cause the National Parks to become more expensive to visit, through increase in entrance or yearly fees, or in some cases even shutting down National Parks. Our national parks are becoming increasingly vulnerable to destruction as climate change will negatively impact the ecosystems of many of our National Parks." Seraphim System  ( talk ) 05:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.