Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finchley Arrow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete Jayjg (talk) 01:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Finchley Arrow

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I have failed to find any significant third-party coverage of this subject. The article doesn't explain WHY the article subject is notable, so this article fails WP:N (and/or WP:GNG), WP:RS, and possibly WP:V. ArcAngel (talk) 04:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability, no outside sources. It's just a website. Absolutely nothing special about that. DarkAudit (talk) 05:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable yet, the paper is only two months old. Its also a specifically local WP:Notability (local interests) paper. Grim23 ★  16:39, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources to demonstrate notability. No info on circulation, no awards won. No more notable than someone's hobby at this point. Distributed in one postal zone. Edison (talk) 17:41, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 01:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.