Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finders Keepers (casual game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 00:16, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Finders Keepers (casual game)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable video game with no non-trivial media coverage. Fails WP:NOTE. Created and all content by a WP:SPA. Precious Roy (talk) 20:34, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 21:31, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - nn flash game --T-rex 01:05, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass the notability hurdle with only one in-depth reliable source, which is the Gamezebo review in the external links. Despite apparently being popular, the game has failed to attract attention from reviewers, another full-sized review would be needed, none coming up in a search. Someoneanother 01:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources indicates that this game is non-notable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 17:32, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Well-known, easily obtainable, popular game, review hunt hampered by very common name. "Break all rules" Robina Fox (talk) 09:13, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Verifiable, third-party sources to verify its well-known-ness? MuZemike (talk) 06:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - we have at least some source for now. Though this article may not be notable enoguh we can still improve it.-- Freewayguy What's up? 00:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * What source is that? The reference given doesn't even show what it claims to show. Precious Roy (talk) 01:23, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Press releases are not sufficient to establish notability. The Gamezebo source is not verifiable per WP:V. MuZemike (talk) 22:33, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MuZemike (talk) 15:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: despite claims otherwise, no reliable third-party sources on this title, and certainly not enough to write a verifiable article. Randomran (talk) 15:48, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete BountyHunter2008 (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable. Xeron220 (talk) 16:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete NN. WP:NOTE Perfect  Proposal  17:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per reasons stated above. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 18:46, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.