Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Findfile

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Article not edited since AfD tag, so no conditions below are triggered. -Splash talk 21:53, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Findfile
Unsubstantiated story about how Peter Norton supposedly stole a program. Found nothing on Google; subject otherwise is too minor for its own article. Don't know to where it could be merged (The Norton Utilities program is apparently called "FileFind", not "Findfile"). Evil saltine 09:30, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, unless sources can be found. If this is verified, keep, with wikifying and NPOVing. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 09:49, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, unless sources can be found, than maybe consider. Also, this looks like a copy/paste to me, but I can't prove that yet.  I'm skeptical that somebody wrote this much content, from scratch, for an event in 1982.  Also notice the lack of wiki-links for that amount of content (signal of copy/paste).  We need to see the source of the information both to verify it's truth, and to have a little assurance it's not a copyvio.  If kept, it needs a better name, since this is a pretty common name for utilities and functions.  --rob 11:06, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * If verified, merge, else delete. — Phil Welch 23:32, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.