Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finding Kraftland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 17:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Finding Kraftland

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

"independent documentary" doesn't ring good for notability, and sources are similarly dubious. Punkmorten (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep – I believe it meets the minimum requirements based on these reviews . I’ll reference and cite the piece and see if that satisfies everyone.  Thanks. ShoesssS Talk 18:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Based on the shedload of festival showings and awards at said festials, I'd be surprised if at least one of those awards isn't noteworthy. Someone from the MOVIE wikiproject should take a look at this. - Mgm|(talk) 23:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:15, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I know it's a primary source, but just look at the official website for the film: http://www.findingkraftland.com/ and note the number of film festival screenings and awards won from those film festivals. I'll take a stab at finding secondary sources for the awards later, but I think this is enough notability even without that. Raven1977 (talk) 06:23, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: Meets the minimal requirements for me, although article was probably wrote by the director lol. Ryan 4314   (talk) 07:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. With respects to the nom, I have a hard time finding The San diego News Tribune, San Fernando Valley Business Journal, The Oxford Press, and Armstrong Interviews as "dubious". The article meets the requirements of Notability (film) and is a welcome addition to Wikipedia.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.