Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finecure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Finecure

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:COMPANY. Article has no assertion of the subject's notability, and I am unable to find any significant coverage in secondary sources. Aka042 (talk) 21:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Is this one back yet again? As per both the other times this has been deleted, this manages the pretty much unique achievement, for a pharmaceutical company, of zero news hits, only a single Scholar hit, and that's just as the manufacturer of a product in a trial (the others are false-positive hits on misscans of "sinecure"), and zero gBooks hits. To double check that this isn't just Google-bias, have run the same search on the Times of India news archive; again, they've never once been mentioned. – iride  scent  22:08, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. - non notable company.--Sodabottle (talk) 14:17, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources, no significant coverage, no notability. First Light (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.