Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finger claws


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:32, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Finger claws

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG, no reliable sources cited, seems designed to promote an origami website. Kleuske (talk) 14:55, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 14:55, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 14:55, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 14:55, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I find a few hits in Gnews, but it's about animals with finger/claws. Nothing about a fashion item. Oaktree b (talk) 22:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. There is something here, but WP:GNG is a major problem. The sources cited IMHO are rather niche, there are issues with OR/SYNTH. Unless we find something discussing this item as a trope in reliable sources, pass. Interestingly, TV tropes doesn't have an entry for that (I think it should), instead they divide the concept into https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FemmeFatalons and https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WolverineClaws . PS. The article seems more focused on the concept of jewelry accessory, and as such is indeed possibly a form of cryptospam, trying to use Wikipedia to advertise a niche product from one of the linked websites. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:37, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. The concept hasn't been covered anywhere, and it appears some editors are trying to synthesize a topic from their own observations. That's just WP:NOT what Wikipedia is for, though I'm sure someone might find it interesting. Shooterwalker (talk) 21:12, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Like, okay, you can put claws on your fingers. But with no sources talking about it, it's a clear notability failure. Fails WP:GNG.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of significant coverage, mentions that I can find are surface-level.Brayan ocaner (talk) 10:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.