Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fingerjade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's vandalproof page &#x260E;  ) 18:18, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Fingerjade
Article makes no assertion of notability, no evidence that the band has been signed or released any records, not on allmusic.com, and scores the coveted zero Google hits, the Web's favourite benchmark of band vanity. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 12:11, 19 November 2005 (UTC)


 * That is an incorrect opinion because as stated within the article Fingerjade is in the market for a record deal having rejected two proposals from distinguished labels. I am a resident of the ACT and I can assure these young men put on a brilliant live show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mystrat (talk • contribs) 22:40, 19 November 2005
 * So the fact that they are unsigned is incorrect because they are unsigned? Er, right :-) - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 14:28, 22 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 08:57, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * delete as per nom Pete.Hurd 21:51, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Johnleemk | Talk 09:30, 24 November 2005 (UTC)


 * I have also heard the band play and I vouch for their reliability. This cannot be a "free"  encyclopedia when people will delete quality articles and social commentaries.  Cool down and don't be so annoyed over the "waste of space" this article is...   Accept it and move on to better things in life than whining 203.129.52.116 10:58, 24 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable band. jni 11:03, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't delete it; burn it with fire. If no fire is available, burn it with something almost as cool as fire, but more easily-obtained.  I'm from the ACT, too. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 10:02, 26 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.