Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiqh al ibadat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Islamic theological jurisprudence. and make good points about how this could be a valid search term in jurisprudence. I JethroBT drop me a line 06:03, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Fiqh al ibadat

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unreferenced Rathfelder (talk) 22:19, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete The article is a bad translation of the linked article on the Arabic WP, which is also completely unsourced. The subject is a major field of Islamic jurisprudence, but this version is barely intelligible WP:OR and calls for a WP:TNT deletion. Eperoton (talk) 00:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to fiqh (or maybe another target, see down below) per Eperoton. Half of this article is about fiqh (jurisprudence) in general. The other half about fiqh al-ibadat is just one field of jurisprudence, specifically that which deals with matters of worship. In that sense, I wonder if it is the same as Islamic theological jurisprudence. Said article, however, links to ar:مناسخة&lrm;, but I am unable to understand Arabic sufficiently to tell the difference. - HyperGaruda (talk) 06:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Islamic theological jurisprudence is not a category I've seen before. Theology (what one should believe) and jurisprudence (what one should do) are different fields in traditional Islamic studies. Fiqh al-Ibadat is usually translated as laws dealing with matters of ritual, worship, and the like. I've just deleted a bizarre coatrack section about legal maturity from it. When Fiqh al ibadat article gets deleted, I'll create a stub for Fiqh al-Ibadat and we can delete Islamic theological jurisprudence too. The interlanguage links are completely off-the-wall (مناسخة is a term from inheritance law). So, to sum up, yes to redirecting to Fiqh for now. Eperoton (talk) 23:24, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * P.S. After more thought, I've requested a move of Islamic theological jurisprudence to Islamic ritual jurisprudence. So, we can redirect to Islamic theological jurisprudence and the bot will fix the double redirect later. Eperoton (talk) 03:12, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- as original essay and unreferenced. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:10, 1 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.