Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire & Ice (Retail)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 01:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Fire & Ice (Retail)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Advertising page, possible conflict of interest with author as well. Not quite sure if the store meets WP:CORP as well. Wildthing61476 15:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, its only advertising. Neither does it assert notability. --soum talk 16:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:CORP (no independent, reliable secondary sources). The result is an entirely promotional, non-encyclopedic article. MastCell Talk 16:56, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Blantant advertising. Fails WP:Notability.--Edtropolis 17:30, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This page is just blatant advertising. I recommend the creator reads WP:CORP.
 * Comment This sounds fishy. If you go to User:Fireandiceretail it will rederect to the article.  I think this is the company's work.  J O N J O N B T
 * Nevermind.J O N J O N B T
 * The creator's been indefinitely blocked for inappropriate username. Wildthing61476 18:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * That cross-namespace redirect should be nuked too? DMacks 20:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. I went ahead and removed the redirect. Wildthing61476 20:44, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Very close to G11. Morgan Wick 20:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced and promotional. --Dhartung | Talk 01:43, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete blatant WP:COI case. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  03:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not only is the chain non notable, the whole article reads like something one would find on a promotional leaflet.--Kylohk 14:39, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete.It is an advertisement for a store and nothing more. archiemartin
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.