Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire Blast


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Wickethewok 14:28, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Fire Blast/Blisskarm
Two more Pokémon articles waiting to get yanked. Turned the prods into one AfD. Shin'ou's TTV (Futaba|Masago|Kotobuki) 20:44, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe .RON   talk  23:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete both Pages for individual attacks? TJ Spyke 20:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Blisskarm is a combo of Skarmory and Blissey used in competitive battling. Fire Blast is an attack. Shin'ou's TTV (Futaba|Masago|Kotobuki) 21:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Both, as per nom. PJM 20:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOT a game guide. Sandstein 21:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete They're both useless. Joiz A|A. Shmo 21:22, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete both per above, and the reasons I gave in the prods. -Amarkov babble 21:34, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete'. This page is pointless, and doesn't make sense. It doesn't belong on Wikipedia 0-172 21:50, 13 October (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -Amarkov babble 21:45, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Good Lord!  T H  L  21:50, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete i can't imagine what would happen if we created a article for each individual pokemon attack, not to mention each pokemon strategy.... -- `/aksha 03:59, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * We would all be slaughtered, and our deaths would be justified.  T H  L 
 * Strong delete Redundant for those who specialize in the relevant fields, and useless for all others. -- The Raven's Apprentice (Talk 05:29, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't see how an attack or strategy could make an article. --RandomOrca2 03:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:NOT a game guide. However, leaving the prods up would have been okay as well (prod was a way to alleviate AfD backlog).  Just a reminder.  ColourBurst 03:28, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a game guide. Blue Mirage | Comment 11:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.