Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire Emblem: Seisen no Keifu story


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Fire Emblem: Seisen no Keifu story

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This "article" is basically one giant plot summary. The amount of information is ridiculous and probably can't be merged effectively without deleting most of it.--ZXCVBNM 02:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - straight copy from here. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry 02:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; I see Haemo suggested a merge a month ago, which was opposed. So delete away, this violates WP:NOT. Masaruemoto 02:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Borderline WP:CSD copyvio problems. — Travis talk  02:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:CSD for the copyvio problems, and per WP:NOT due to the nature of the content. --Nenyedi Talk Deeds@ 12:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 18:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge back into the main article. I agree that this is somewhat excessively detailed, but outright deleting it would leave a hole in the main article. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  22:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and summarize to make consistent with similar articles, e.g. Fire Emblem (video game). Article may be overlong and unsourced, but those aren't deletion criteria per WP:DP or WP:CSD. Turning it into a smaller section of the main article would make it compliant with WP:NOT. Copyright violation accusations seem unfounded. From the search results Chase provided, I followed all the links from the first page.  All links that worked indicated content was copied from Wikipedia – specifically an earlier version of the Fire Emblem: Seisen no Keifu article, before the plot was separated. Infernal Inferno 00:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree on the point regarding the supposed copyvio problems. As far as I can see, the original source of the material was Fire Emblem: Seisen no Keifu. --- RockMFR 03:56, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I am against the crackdown on detailed articles. There is no copyright violation.  The content was originally on the Fire Emblem: Seisen no Keifu main article.  Deleting the article will put a hole into the main article.  Merging it will not, because you can always use the  History function to retrieve it.  I am very saddened that there has been a deletion war on the Fire Emblem section of Wikipedia.  Decimus Tedius Regio Zanarukando 01:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Holy crap, I would have suggested merge but the length of that is ridiculous! Delete, before it infects the main article. Axem Titanium 13:22, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete the excessive plot article. Write an actual summary on the main article, please. ' 16:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.