Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire Lord Ozai (Avatar: The Last Airbender)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Fire Lord Ozai (Avatar: The Last Airbender)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Completely in-universe article about a character that, though important to the series, barely appears in it. Very few, if any, outside sources due to the character's scarcity. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 05:16, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No out-of-universe notability. Fire Lord Ozai already redirects to the list of the series' characters, which already contains sufficient info on the character. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 06:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * This is key information which should have been included by the nominator. Thanks for that, TPH. Jclemens (talk) 19:46, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per TPH, Sadads (talk) 19:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is written with an in-universe perspective and lacks real-world perspective, it has no references independent of the subject from third-party sources, it does not meet the general notability guideline and it's a plot-only description of a fictional work. Jfgslo (talk) 18:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  05:57, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per various violations of Wikipedia guidelines and policies addressed above. -- LoЯd  ۞pεth  06:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, with a feeling a deja vu. Hasn't this article, under another name, been through here before? (I checked the history, though, and couldn't find it at a quick glance.) r ʨ anaɢ (talk) 04:28, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.