Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire Machines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:43, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Fire Machines

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Short-lived local company and my multiple searches simply found nothing at all so although there may be some sources archived and at local news media, this is enough to show the company never got noticeable attention and, at best if necessary, this can be mentioned elsewhere such as Edina, Minnesota's article about this company but I'm not seeing much need. SwisterTwister  talk  04:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  04:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  04:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  04:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete No evidence of non-trivial coverage by reliable sources, the article fully admits one of its sources was basically a paid promotion, non-notable defunct company. Nsteffel (talk) 22:11, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   16:04, 7 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   15:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.