Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire brick red


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash talk 17:39, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Fire brick red
All of the colour articles were subject to a blanket AfD here. This was closed as a delete all, although the talk page for that AfD was tabulated otherwise. VfU opted to undelete all the articles and give them seperate AfDs (see the bottom of VfU for my reasoning on this). So here they are. If you wish to make a blanket comment on these articles please copy paste your comment into each &mdash; do not expect the closer to extrapolate your intent in these exceptional circumstances. Thank you. No comment from me. -Splash talk 23:51, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Without any kind of source or authority for the name, this is useless, This is not a start to a real article. Contains virtually no information not obvious from the article title. The entire contents of this article could be presented much more usefully as an entry in a a table. This is self-indulgent article-creation vanity. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:24, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, rename to firebrick red. Compare for example Central (MTR) or some of the 12,500 Google hits. --Pjacobi 00:38, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, color of a thing. Gazpacho 00:56, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * An unreferenced shade of ochre. *Delete. Pilatus 01:07, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per my vote in previous Afd Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   01:38, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Plus it's always going to be a stub unless something monumental happens. Ryan Norton T 02:28, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete last time around I said merge if sourced, but there is still no source --TimPope 16:34, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for the same reason as before (need a source, if only an image of the colour) Sliggy 19:06, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete meaningful-content-free color articles. MCB 00:40, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Silly, meaningless color articles--Sean Jelly Baby? 21:10, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --Optichan 22:21, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge, notable color.  Grue  16:29, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No source and not expandable. Carbonite | Talk 16:32, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep article does no harm whatsoever. Dmn  €  &#1332;&#1396;&#1398; 23:52, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.