Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire of Love: Red (2023 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Fire of Love: Red (2023 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Draftify: Disputed draftification, blatant advert, unreleased, currently fails WP:NFILM. Cannot remain in main space 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify as too soon. This is an unreleased film and does not meet the standards for notability of unreleased films, because production itself has not been notable.  Nothing in this article provides significant coverage so that general notability is not met.  Robert McClenon (talk) 05:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify per nom. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify. As-yet-unreleased films are not all automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they're in the production pipeline. Any number of things can happen during the production process to significantly delay and/or completely derail the film, and even released films can sometimes still fail to achieve anything that would satisfy WP:NFILM at all — so films normally don't clear the bar at all until they're released, and films still in the pipeline get articles only in fairly rare special cases where the production process itself has attained significant notability, such as Marvel or Star Wars films that generate a lot of production coverage to the point that even if they did fail to ever get completed or released they'd still likely be permanently notable anyway. So no prejudice against recreation if and when this is released and starts getting reviewed by film critics, but nothing here is already enough today. Bearcat (talk) 15:48, 9 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.