Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firearms 2 (Computer Game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. —Doug Bell talk 06:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Firearms 2 (Computer Game)

 * View single debate
 * View single debate

Proposed for deletion as WP:NOT a crystal ball, WP:V, and non-notable web product. Was deleted, then recreated with identical content. I was going to speedy delete per WP:SPEEDY but noticed "This clause does not apply if the only prior deletions were speedy or proposed deletions". To stop this cycle happening again, I decided to list for deletion per the original proposer. Rockpock e  t  00:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Slgr @ ndson (page - messages - contribs) 00:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Uh... an in-development mod? Delete. -- Kicking222 01:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete I was the one who tagged for speedy. I didn't know that G4 didn't apply due to that clause. Mod is not released, and not noteworthy or notable. No awards etc. Hell, it's not even the official sequel to Firearms 1, they just stole the title and are freeloading off the name. WP:NOT a crystal ball. Entirely OR and POV. Reads like an advertisement. A million reasons to delete, none to save. &rArr;    SWAT Jester    Ready    Aim    Fire!  04:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORP and WP:NOT a crystal ball. Pan Dan 16:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * delete especially in-development mods, since there are so many and they usually aren't finished. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 15:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - 'Firearms 2 is a planned multiplayer mod' I didn't read any further than that and didn't need to. WP:NOT a crystal ball. The Kinslayer 16:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: - that is not a valid criterion for speedy deletion. Rockpock  e  t  19:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.