Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firebot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 21:50, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Firebot

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article fails to establish that either Firebot were important or notable. Delete. NotARealWord (talk) 07:42, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Mini-Cons. Mathewignash (talk) 09:38, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - No independent reliable sources. Fails GNG. Skinny87 (talk) 12:44, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete REALLY obscure, unlikely substantial reliable sources exist. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Mini-Cons. Why are people so intent on deleting these articles instead of redirecting to the appropriate character lists? --Divebomb (talk) 14:12, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete poor sources and lack of notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 16:07, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.