Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firedrive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 12:34, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Firedrive

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:WEBCRIT. Article's notability was pegged to supposed Forbes designation as top cloud storage site, added by since-blocked spammer. But the "article" in question was by a blogger not employed by Forbes and explicitly not stating Forbes' opinion. No other citations provided meet the criteria of the notability guideline, Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 20:49, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:30, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:30, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:30, 31 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete The only interesting thing here was the DCMA legal issues. I looked to see if there was an article where this paragraph could be moved, but didn't find anything. There is a small list of key DCMA take-down legal cases on the DCMA article, but this wouldn't merit that. I was surprised that there was no section on legal issues on the article for Streaming_media since this might fit there. A full list of DCMA take-down claims would, of course, be overwhelming. LaMona (talk) 16:02, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:54, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Tried the usual searches + Highbeam and found nothing that hasn't been discovered in the discussion previous. --j⚛e deckertalk 01:07, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.