Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fireflies festival


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The consensus is that the article should be kept as media coverage exists though it needs to be cleaned up. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Fireflies festival

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable festival. References are all to blogs, which are of course the most reliable sources in existence. Ironholds (talk) 20:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Weak keep - The Hindu is certainly a reliable source, and there seem to be a few more hits there. It's a start at least. Jfire (talk) 20:08, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- Abecedare (talk) 00:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. It seems notable but the article has some serious issues. If it could be re-written by someone with a sound knowledge of the subject, with WP:RS, it should be kept. HJMitchell    You rang?  15:05, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:00, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep there are a couple of reliable sources as discussed above. They should be included in the article and yes it needs a huge cleanup.  In addition there are plenty of notable performers.  Lastly, thank goodness no one was injured by the scorpion last year. Drawn Some (talk) 19:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. There's enough news hits:. Fences and windows (talk) 03:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep As per the media coverage presented by Fences and windows. The article needs to be cleaned up, not thrown out. Pastor Theo (talk) 10:47, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.