Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firefly (mobile phone)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) '''-- [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Riley_Huntley/You_missed! Cheers, ] Ri l ey   ''' 00:18, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Firefly (mobile phone)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced article about a single non-notable product Biker Biker (talk) 10:24, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:52, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep:, , , , , , . Something tells me the nominator forgot about WP:BEFORE, because there are clearly enough good sources here for WP:GNG to be comfortably met. Lukeno94 (talk) 11:40, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep a quick check shows plenty of references to fill out the article, someone just needs to do it. — Ed! (talk) 14:05, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - The topic passes WP:N, having received significant coverage in reliable sources:
 * Firefly mobile phone designed for four year-olds - Telegraph
 * Firefly Mobile's Metamorphosis - Forbes.com
 * Firefly mobile aimed at toddlers | News | PC Pro
 * Firefly Review & Rating | PCMag.com
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 01:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.