Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firka (software)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:01, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Firka (software)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable software—J. M. (talk) 16:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 5.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 17:16, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:33, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &Alpha; Guy into Books &trade;  &sect; ( Message ) -  13:00, 12 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: fails all four criteria for software notability: no independent, reliable coverage, no educational significance, no major reviews and no recognition in the technological community. A sources search reveals little other than forum posts which are no good for establishing notability due to lack of editorial oversight and self-published sources.    Dr Strauss   talk   13:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: A WP:SPA article on a software item with poor references: one primary and the other a software gallery. I am not finding better and see nothing which could meet the WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG criteria. AllyD (talk) 16:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.