Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firmus Advisory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 01:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Firmus Advisory

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subtle promotional article on a non notable organization that fails to meet WP:NCORP as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. The sources used in the article aren’t even about the organization and a WP:BEFORE shows user generated sources, self published sources, press releases, and directories. Nothing cogent at all, needless to say WP:ORGDEPTH is non existent. Celestina007 (talk) 21:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. The RS here is low quality, and this company is mentioned in it only referentially. Fails WP:NCORP - not notable company. Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep The company has received significant coverage in third party sources and they meet the basic notability criteria. Owula kpakpo (talk) 08:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment — The editor above is the article creator who is yet to show via reliable sources how this subtle promo article meets WP:NCORP. If you can’t show us reliable sources to substantiate your assertions then your !vote is invalid as it constitutes mere claims, see WP:ATA. Celestina007 (talk) 10:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources ---  Robertjamal12   (talk)  09:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
 * @, please can you show us what reliable sources show this organization to be notable? See WP:SIRS can you show how it is applicable here? If you can’t your !vote is invalid as you making a claim without substantiating it. Celestina007 (talk) 10:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete lacking in depth coverage to meet WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 01:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom unless sources other than PR and passing mentions can be shown to exist. Mccapra (talk) 03:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet WP:N. First source has only a trivial mention of the subject. Same with the second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth sources. Each source mentions the subject only once in a brief manner, often referring simply to a report the subject produced. Given the coverage does not address the subject of the article directly and in detail, WP:SIGCOV is not satisfied and hence nor WP:GNG or WP:N - Such-change47 (talk) 08:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not satisfy WP:GNG MaskedSinger (talk) 16:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.